IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19948471132-1138_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indicators for monitoring the growth of peruvian infants: Weight and length gain vs attained weight and length

Author

Listed:
  • Piwoz, E.G.
  • De Romana, G.L.
  • De Kanashiro, H.C.
  • Black, R.E.
  • Brown, K.H.

Abstract

Objectives. To determine appropriate indicators and age intervals for growth monitoring in this population, the relationship between monthly weight and length indicators and nutritional status at 12 months was evaluated among 102 low-income Peruvian infants. Methods. Cutoffs for defining adequate vs slow growth were obtained from published reference data, and sensitivities and specificities of each indicator were calculated. Results. Low weight gain in early infancy, especially from 1 to 2 months, is useful for predicting low weight at 1 year (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 65%, 25th percentile cutoff). Use of actual weight at 2 months, however, produces comparable results (sensitivity = 86%, specificity = 57%, 50th percentile cutoff). Monthly length gains were weak predictors of low length for age. Neither weight nor length gains accurately predicted the opposite form of undernutrition. Nonhuman milk consumption before 4 months and poor appetite from 3 to 12 months were related to low early weight gain and subsequent undernutrition. Conclusions. Growth monitoring programs in this population should enroll infants at birth, monitor actual weight, promote exclusive breast-feeding and delayed introduction of nonhuman milk, and provide specific feeding advice to mothers of infants with frequently depressed appetites.

Suggested Citation

  • Piwoz, E.G. & De Romana, G.L. & De Kanashiro, H.C. & Black, R.E. & Brown, K.H., 1994. "Indicators for monitoring the growth of peruvian infants: Weight and length gain vs attained weight and length," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(7), pages 1132-1138.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:7:1132-1138_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:7:1132-1138_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.