IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199484111780-1785_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The prevalence of back pain, hand discomfort, and dermatitis in the US working population

Author

Listed:
  • Behrens, V.
  • Seligman, P.
  • Cameron, L.
  • Mathias, C.G.T.
  • Fine, L.

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of the study was to provide the health care and public health communities with national prevalence estimates of selected conditions in the US working population. Methods. National prevalence estimates of self-reported conditions among working people were calculated from data collected for the 1988 Occupational Health Supplement to the National Health Interview Survey. Results. The highest prevalence estimates were found among occupational groups. For example, the prevalence of back pain due to an injury at work among truck drivers was 6.7%; back pain due to repeated activities at work among mechanics and repairers of heavy equipment and machinery was 10.5%; hand discomfort among operators of machines that process metal, plastic, stone, and glass was 23.5%; and dermatitis due to contact with substances at work among physicians, dentists, nurses, pharmacists, and dietitians was 5.6%. Conclusions. A substantial proportion of these conditions among occupational groups with the highest prevalence estimates are occupational in origin. These prevalence estimates identify occupations in which efforts are needed to prevent these conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Behrens, V. & Seligman, P. & Cameron, L. & Mathias, C.G.T. & Fine, L., 1994. "The prevalence of back pain, hand discomfort, and dermatitis in the US working population," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(11), pages 1780-1785.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:11:1780-1785_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:11:1780-1785_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.