IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199484101669-1671_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient adherence to guidelines for diabetes eye care: Results from the diabetic eye disease follow-up study

Author

Listed:
  • Will, J.C.
  • German, R.R.
  • Schurman, E.
  • Michael, S.
  • Kurth, D.M.
  • Deeb, L.

Abstract

Early detection and treatment of diabetic eye disease can prevent blindness, yet many persons with diabetes lack regular eye care. This study followed 569 people with diabetes participating in blindness prevention programs during 1985 through 1987; it was found that 35% of subjects received dilated eye examinations before entering the programs, in comparison with 60% afterward. About 85% of participants referred for proliferative retinopathy treatment began such treatment, and, of these, 85% completed treatment. A lack of knowledge about the disease and limited finances were primary reasons for nonadherence. To improve the effectiveness of prevention programs, eye care providers and program staff must strive to eliminate these educational and financial barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Will, J.C. & German, R.R. & Schurman, E. & Michael, S. & Kurth, D.M. & Deeb, L., 1994. "Patient adherence to guidelines for diabetes eye care: Results from the diabetic eye disease follow-up study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(10), pages 1669-1671.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:10:1669-1671_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:10:1669-1671_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.