IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1993837966-971_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mortality in a public and a private hospital compared: The severity of antecedent disorders in medicare patients

Author

Listed:
  • Burns, R.
  • Nichols, L.O.
  • Graney, M.J.
  • Applegate, W.B.

Abstract

Objectives. The objectives of this study were to determine (1) if there were significant differences between patients who died at a public hospital and those who died at a university hospital that functions as a private, community hospital, and (2) if those differences were associated with an increased risk of death. Methods. Chart review collected variables used by the Health Care Financing Administration in mortality analyses to examine how severity of illness data contribute to accurate predictions of death in a public hospital compared with a university hospital. Results. Compared with patients who died at the university hospital, public hospital patients who died had more comorbid disease, were more severely ill, more likely to be emergently admitted, and more likely to be admitted from an extended-care facility. Inclusion of severity of illness with variables previously used to predict mortality significantly improved the accuracy of mortality prediction models for the public hospital but not for the university hospital. Conclusions. The results suggest that urban public hospitals provide care to more severely ill patients. Administrative data sets may not be adequate to identify these differences between patient populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Burns, R. & Nichols, L.O. & Graney, M.J. & Applegate, W.B., 1993. "Mortality in a public and a private hospital compared: The severity of antecedent disorders in medicare patients," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(7), pages 966-971.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:7:966-971_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:7:966-971_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.