IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1993833379-384_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treating measles: The appropriateness of admission to a Wisconsin Children's Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Havens, P.L.
  • Butler, J.C.
  • Day, S.E.
  • Mohr, B.A.
  • Davis, J.P.
  • Chusid, M.J.

Abstract

Objectives. A large number of children with measles were hospitalized at a children's hospital during a metropolitan measles outbreak. In this study we addressed the appropriateness of those admissions. Methods. Charts of all 634 patients with a diagnosis of measles who were treated between August 1989 and April 1990 were reviewed. Determination of the appropriateness of hospital admission was based on severity of illness and presence of severe complications of measles. Results. Of 564 patients with clinical measles or serologic evidence of recent infection, 252 were inpatients (median age 1.5 years) and 312 were outpatients (median age 2.1 years). Fifty-nine (23.4%) of the inpatients had been inappropriately admitted. Inpatients were significantly more likely than outpatients to have physiologic instability or a clinical complication. Children 15 months of age or younger were more likely to be hospitalized, as were children evaluated in the first 3 months of the outbreak period, even if admission was not appropriate on the basis of physiologic instability or complications. Conclusions. Younger patients with measles and patients evaluated earlier in the epidemic were more likely to be admitted to the hospital even when admission was inappropriate as assessed by degree of physiologic instability or presence of complications.

Suggested Citation

  • Havens, P.L. & Butler, J.C. & Day, S.E. & Mohr, B.A. & Davis, J.P. & Chusid, M.J., 1993. "Treating measles: The appropriateness of admission to a Wisconsin Children's Hospital," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(3), pages 379-384.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:3:379-384_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:3:379-384_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.