IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199383121689-1693_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis B in a dermatology practice

Author

Listed:
  • Hlady, W.G.
  • Hopkins, R.S.
  • Ogilby, T.E.
  • Allen, S.T.

Abstract

Objective. The purpose of the study was to investigate infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among patients in a dermatology practice. Methods. Historical cohort, matched case-control, and cross-sectional survey methods were used. Results. The age-specific incidence of reported HBV infection in the practice from 1985 through 1991 was more than 12 times the expected rate. The dermatologist was not an HBV carrier. He practiced neither universal precautions nor sterile surgical technique. Seroprevalence of markers for HBV infection was highest (36.8%) among patients who had had surgery on the same day that HBV was apparently acquired by an index case; seroprevalence was near the expected background level for patients not exposed to index cases. Of HBV-infected patients with known dates of onset, 72% had had surgery during their incubation periods. All of 30 HBV antigen specimens tested were of the same subtype. None of the patients tested, including 74 patients exposed to surgery on the same day as a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, had evidence of HIV infection. Conclusions. HBV, but not HIV, was transmitted from patient to patient by the dermatologist's failure to apply either universal precautions or sterile surgical technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Hlady, W.G. & Hopkins, R.S. & Ogilby, T.E. & Allen, S.T., 1993. "Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis B in a dermatology practice," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(12), pages 1689-1693.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:12:1689-1693_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:12:1689-1693_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.