IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/198777133-37_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambulatory surgery utilization by age level

Author

Listed:
  • Lagoe, R.J.
  • Bice, S.E.
  • Abulencia, P.B.

Abstract

We compared ambulatory and inpatient surgery utilization by age level for procedures known to be frequently performed on an ambulatory basis. Our scope of data was the Crouse Irving Memorial Hospital in Syracuse, New York during 1984. The hospital operates one of the largest freestanding ambulatory surgery programs in the United States. The study included 8,348 ambulatory procedures, 42 percent of all operations performed under the aegis of the institution. At the aggregate, the inpatient surgery included a somewhat lower proportion of young adults and a higher proportion of individuals aged 65 and over than did outpatient surgery. For specific procedures, however, age distributions differed. Ambulatory procedures included lower percentages of elderly than did inpatient utilization for inguinal hernia repair, carpal tunnel release, destruction of larynx lesions, hernia repairs, destruction of skin lesions, and other operations, while ambulatory utilization for lens procedures included higher percentages of elderly patients than did inpatient utilization. Physician practice patterns also appeared to influence the setting of certain procedures. The study data suggest that persons involved in health planning should evaluate ambulatory surgery use on an age and procedure-specific basis, and utilization review should evaluate procedures on a case-by-case basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Lagoe, R.J. & Bice, S.E. & Abulencia, P.B., 1987. "Ambulatory surgery utilization by age level," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 77(1), pages 33-37.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1987:77:1:33-37_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1987:77:1:33-37_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.