IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19867691109-1111_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The benefits of evaluating close associates of child tuberculin reactors from a high prevalence group

Author

Listed:
  • Sullam, P.M.
  • Slutkin, G.
  • Hopewell, P.C.

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of evaluating persons (associates) in close contact to children with significant tuberculin reactions, we prospectively evaluated 831 associates of 297 children younger than eight years who had significant (≥10 mm) tuberculin reactions. Eighty-seven per cent of the index reactors were foreign-born, as were 84 per cent of the associates. All associates were evaluated by tuberculin skin testing: chest roentgenograms and sputum cultures were obtained if indicated. Four hundred sixty-one (55 per cent) of the associates had significant tuberculin reactions, and 15 had current tuberculosis. However, only three of these cases were newly discovered (total case rate: 1.81/100, new case rate: 0.36/100). Two of the three new cases were detected in the associates of children younger than three years of age. In addition, 338 candidates for isoniazid (INH) preventive therapy were found. We conclude that although the yield of new cases was low, the evaluation of associates did provide a convenient, high yield method of identifying candidates for INH preventive therapy. Moreover, it served as a useful mechanism for monitoring the adequacy of other case-finding activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sullam, P.M. & Slutkin, G. & Hopewell, P.C., 1986. "The benefits of evaluating close associates of child tuberculin reactors from a high prevalence group," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 76(9), pages 1109-1111.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1986:76:9:1109-1111_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1986:76:9:1109-1111_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.