IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1985758858-862_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smoke detector legislation: Its effect on owner-occupied homes

Author

Listed:
  • McLoughlin, E.
  • Marchone, M.
  • Hanger, S.L.
  • German, P.S.
  • Baker, S.P.

Abstract

Montgomery County, Maryland was the first major jurisdiction to pass a law requiring smoke detectors in all homes. Smoke detector coverage in the county was evaluated five years after the law's implementation and compared to the coverage in neighboring Fairfax County, Virginia, which has no such law. Firefighters visited 651 randomy selected owner-occupied homes and tested each detector. While a similar percentage of homes in Montgomery and Fairfax counties complied with detector codes (42% vs 44%, respectively), Montgomery County had a significantly lower percentage of homes with no working detectors (17% vs 30%) and with no detectors at all (6% vs 16%). In general, Montgomery County residents complied with what they believed the law required, but lacked knowledge of the law's details. New homes where building codes required detectors and homes where owners assumed that detectors were required by law were likely to have working detectors. Analyses of 12 years of fire data suggest that as a county approaches complete detector coverage, the risk of residential fire deaths decreases. An essentially unenforced law seems to be obeyed because it conforms to community values.

Suggested Citation

  • McLoughlin, E. & Marchone, M. & Hanger, S.L. & German, P.S. & Baker, S.P., 1985. "Smoke detector legislation: Its effect on owner-occupied homes," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 75(8), pages 858-862.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1985:75:8:858-862_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1985:75:8:858-862_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.