IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/198474152-56_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and methods in a multi-center case-control interview study

Author

Listed:
  • Hartge, P.
  • Cahill, J.I.
  • West, D.
  • Hauck, M.
  • Austin, D.
  • Silverman, D.
  • Hoover, R.

Abstract

We concluded a case-control study in ten areas of the United States in which a total of 2,982 bladder cancer patients and 5,782 population controls were interviewed. We employed a variety of existing and new techniques to reduce bias and to monitor the quality of data collected. We review here many of the design elements and field methods that can be generally applied in epidemiologic studies, particularly multi-center interview studies, and explain the reasons for our selection of the methods, instruments, and procedures used.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartge, P. & Cahill, J.I. & West, D. & Hauck, M. & Austin, D. & Silverman, D. & Hoover, R., 1984. "Design and methods in a multi-center case-control interview study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 74(1), pages 52-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:1:52-56_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:1:52-56_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.