IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1982726567-573_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Memory aids in longitudinal health surveys: results from a field experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus, A.C.

Abstract

The use of memory aids to improve respondent recall is becoming increasingly popular in health surveys. In a one-year field experiment involving over 1,200 respondents, people assigned memory aids reported over 50 per cent more symptom episodes than those not assigned memory aids. Differences in reporting levels were particularly striking during the first six to 12 weeks of the survey, for symptoms related to acute, transitory illness, and among minorities and the lower socioeconomic groups. Respondents assigned memory aids were also more likely to report a doctor contact--especially during the fall/winter months. Among respondent who used their memory aids at least once (N = 252), nearly 35 per cent said they were influenced by the information recorded in their memory aids, and most of those who were influenced said that they became more aware of their health. Ten of these people said that they became more worried or depressed because of the information recorded in their memory aids. This constitutes about a four per cent risk among those people who reported using their memory aids at least once. There was no evidence to suggest that the memory aids influenced perceptions of health status.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus, A.C., 1982. "Memory aids in longitudinal health surveys: results from a field experiment," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 72(6), pages 567-573.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1982:72:6:567-573_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1982:72:6:567-573_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.