IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1977672174-176_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The case finding effectiveness of a self referral system for gonorrhea: a preliminary report

Author

Listed:
  • Potterat, J.J.
  • Rothenberg, R.

Abstract

Our purpose was to examine the efficacy of an alternative to the standard case interview and investigation. Although we recognized from the outset that a short term evaluation could not provide data on disease control, we were able to evaluate the ability of the alternative to detect new cases, and on that basis we developed a sense of its comparative effectiveness and cost. Our data suggest that in this setting, the self referral system is as effective as the standard interview in bringing infected partners of male heterosexual patients to treatment. In fact, by all parameters examined contacts elicited, contacts initiated, contacts seeking medical care, contacts infected, and cost the self referral system did as well or better. Unfortunately, in prior experience with self referral, emphasis has been on the referral slip, rather than on the selfreferral process itself. The return of slips in this study was actually a poor indicator of the efficacy of the system. Through discussions with patients, the clinic staff learned that the slip per se, was often irrelevant and at times a detriment. Contacts often refused the slip, but sought care. The 'process' motivated 86 of the 116 contacts in the Study group, although only 12 slips were actually returned to the clinic. The referral slip may have been important in establishing a 'contract' between the original patient and the health department, but it was not important to the patient's referral of contacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Potterat, J.J. & Rothenberg, R., 1977. "The case finding effectiveness of a self referral system for gonorrhea: a preliminary report," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 67(2), pages 174-176.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1977:67:2:174-176_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1977:67:2:174-176_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.