IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.87.11.1767_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eugenics and Public Health in American History

Author

Listed:
  • Pernick, M.S.

Abstract

Supporters of eugenics, the powerful early 20th-century movement for improving human heredity, often attacked that era's dramatic improvements in public health and medicine for preserving the lives of people they considered hereditarily unfit. Eugenics and public health also battled over whether heredity played a significant role in infectious diseases. However, American public health and eugenics had much in common as well. Eugenic methods often were modeled on the infection control techniques of public health. The goals, values, and concepts of disease of these two movements also often overlapped. This paper sketches some of the key similarities and differences between eugenics and public health in the United States, and it examines how their relationship was shaped by the interaction of science and culture. The results demonstrate that eugenics was not an isolated movement whose significance is confined to the histories of genetics and pseudoscience, but was instead an important and cautionary part of past public health and a general medical history as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Pernick, M.S., 1997. "Eugenics and Public Health in American History," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(11), pages 1767-1772.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.87.11.1767_4
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.87.11.1767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.87.11.1767
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.87.11.1767?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. P. Nelson & Terri B. Davis & Lacey Atkins, 2017. "Reporting and Reparations: News Coverage and the Decision to Compensate the Forcefully Sterilized in North Carolina," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.87.11.1767_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.