IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.71.11.1233_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Second consultant opinion for elective orthopedic surgery

Author

Listed:
  • McCarthy, E.G.
  • Finkel, M.L.

Abstract

We abstracted records of 369 patients whose recommendations for elective orthopedic surgery were not confirmed by a second opinion consultant. Six months or more after the initial recommendation for surgery, 82 per cent had not had the operation performed, irrespective of the diagnosis and the characteristics of the physician recommending surgery. Reasons for consultant non-confirmation included: use of a cast, brace, or corrective footwear preferable (26.3 per cent), symptoms not severe enough (18.4 per cent), and physical therapy/exercises preferable (17.8 per cent).

Suggested Citation

  • McCarthy, E.G. & Finkel, M.L., 1981. "Second consultant opinion for elective orthopedic surgery," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 71(11), pages 1233-1236.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.71.11.1233_9
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.71.11.1233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.71.11.1233
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.71.11.1233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.71.11.1233_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.