IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.70.11.1212_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High prevalence of cervical dysplasia in STD clinic patients warrants routine cytologic screening

Author

Listed:
  • Briggs, R.M.
  • Holmes, K.K.
  • Kiviat, N.

Abstract

The results of routine cervical cytology screening at a Planned Parenthood Center (PPC) clinic were compared to those at a nearby sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic in Seattle. Cervical cytologic findings were consistent with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), grades 1 (mild dysplasia), 2 (moderate dysplasia), or 3 (severe dysplasia to carcinoma in situ) in 502 (5.9%) of 8,504 PPC patients and 87 (11.4%) of 764 STD patients (p=.001). This rate for STD patients is five times that reported for the general population. Sixty-three PPC patients and 31 STD patients with screening smears consistent with CIN 1 or 2 underwent further prospective study by us, including repeated cytologic and colposcopic examinations. Thirty-seven (59%) of 63 PPC patients and 26 (84%) of 31 STD patients (p=.02) had at least one additional smear or colposcopy consistent with CIN and were advised to undergo cervical biopsy. Among those who underwent recommended biopsy, CIN was confirmed histologically in 15 (50%) of PPC patients and 11 (61%) of 18 STD patients. Thus, the proportion of patients who had screening cytologic findings consistent with CIN, the proportion with persistent cytologic or colposcopic findings consistent with CIN on retesting, and the proportion of those biopsied who had histologically confirmed CIN, all were higher for STD than for PPC patients. There is a serious need for cytologic screening in STD clinics throughout the nation.

Suggested Citation

  • Briggs, R.M. & Holmes, K.K. & Kiviat, N., 1980. "High prevalence of cervical dysplasia in STD clinic patients warrants routine cytologic screening," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 70(11), pages 1212-1214.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.70.11.1212_2
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.70.11.1212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.70.11.1212
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.70.11.1212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.70.11.1212_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.