IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2016.303600_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community-based randomized trial of hepatitis b screening among high-risk Vietnamese Americans

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, G.X.
  • Fang, C.Y.
  • Seals, B.
  • Feng, Z.
  • Tan, Y.
  • Siu, P.
  • Yeh, M.C.
  • Golub, S.A.
  • Nguyen, M.T.
  • Tran, T.
  • Wang, M.

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based liver cancer prevention program on hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening among low-income, underserved Vietnamese Americans at high risk. Methods. We conducted a cluster randomized trial involving 36 Vietnamese community-based organizations and 2337 participants in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York City between 2009 and 2014. We randomly assigned 18 community-based organizations to a community-based multilevel HBV screening intervention (n = 1131). We randomly assigned the remaining 18 community-based organizations to a general cancer education program (n = 1206), which included information about HBV-related liver cancer prevention. We assessed HBV screening rates at 6-month follow-up. Results. Intervention participants were significantly more likely to have undergone HBV screening (88.1%) than were control group participants (4.6%). In a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analysis, the intervention effect on screening outcomes remained statistically significant after adjustment for demographic and health care access variables, including income, having health insurance, having a regular health provider, and English proficiency. Conclusions. A community-based, culturally appropriate, multilevel HBV screening intervention effectively increases screening rates in a high-risk, hard-to-reach Vietnamese American population.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, G.X. & Fang, C.Y. & Seals, B. & Feng, Z. & Tan, Y. & Siu, P. & Yeh, M.C. & Golub, S.A. & Nguyen, M.T. & Tran, T. & Wang, M., 2017. "Community-based randomized trial of hepatitis b screening among high-risk Vietnamese Americans," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(3), pages 433-440.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303600_4
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303600
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303600_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.