IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2016.303350_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contributions of the nurses' health studies to reproductive health research

Author

Listed:
  • Chavarro, J.E.
  • Rich-Edwards, J.W.
  • Gaskins, A.J.
  • Farland, L.V.
  • Terry, K.L.
  • Zhang, C.
  • Missmer, S.A.

Abstract

Objectives.To review the Nurses' Health Study's (NHS's) contribution to identifying risk factors and long- Term health consequences of reproductive events. Methods.We performed a narrative review of the NHS I, NHS II, NHS3, and Growing Up Today Study (GUTS) publications between 1976 and 2016. Results. Collection of detailed reproductive history to identify breast cancer risk factors allowed the NHS to document an association between menstrual irregularities, a proxy for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The NHS II found that infertility associated with ovulation problems and gestational diabetes are largely preventable through diet and lifestyle modification. It also identified developmental and nutritional risk factors for pregnancy loss, endometriosis, and uterine leiomyomata. As women in NHS II age, it has become possible to address questions regarding long- Term health consequences of pregnancy complications and benign gynecologic conditions on chronic disease risk. Furthermore, the NHS3 and GUTS are allowing new lines of research into human fertility, PCOS, and transgenerational effects of environmental exposures. Conclusions. The multigenerational resources of the NHSs and GUTS, including linkages of related individuals across cohorts, can improve women's health from preconception through late adulthood and onto the next generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chavarro, J.E. & Rich-Edwards, J.W. & Gaskins, A.J. & Farland, L.V. & Terry, K.L. & Zhang, C. & Missmer, S.A., 2016. "Contributions of the nurses' health studies to reproductive health research," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(9), pages 1669-1676.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303350_7
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303350
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303350_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.