IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2015.302727_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrimination and cumulative disease damage among African American women with systemic lupus erythematosus

Author

Listed:
  • Chae, D.H.
  • Drenkard, C.M.
  • Lewis, T.T.
  • Lim, S.S.

Abstract

Objectives. We examined associations between unfair treatment, attributions of unfair treatment to racial discrimination, and cumulative disease damage among African American women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. We used multivariable regression models to examine SLE damage among 578 African American women in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, recruited to the Georgians Organized Against Lupus cohort. Results. When we controlled for demographic, socioeconomic, and healthrelated covariates, reporting any unfair treatment was associated with greater SLE damage compared with reporting no unfair treatment (b = 0.55; 95% confidence interval = 0.14, 0.97). In general, unfair treatment attributed to nonracial factors was more strongly associated with SLE damage than was unfair treatment attributed to racial discrimination, although the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions. Unfair treatment may contribute to worse disease outcomes among African American women with SLE. Unfair treatment attributed to nonracial causes may have a more pronounced negative effect on SLE damage. Future research may further examine possible differences in the effect of unfair treatment by attribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Chae, D.H. & Drenkard, C.M. & Lewis, T.T. & Lim, S.S., 2015. "Discrimination and cumulative disease damage among African American women with systemic lupus erythematosus," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(10), pages 2099-2107.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2015.302727_0
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302727
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wendy Rodgers & Edith M. Williams & Brittany L. Smalls & Tyler Singleton & Ashley Tennessee & Diane Kamen & Gary Gilkeson, 2020. "Treating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): The Impact of Historical Environmental Context on Healthcare Perceptions and Decision-Making in Charleston, South Carolina," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-10, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2015.302727_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.