IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2013.301825_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insurer views on reimbursement of preventive services in the dental setting: Results from a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Feinstein-Winitzer, R.T.
  • Pollack, H.A.
  • Parish, C.L.
  • Pereyra, M.R.
  • Abel, S.N.
  • Metsch, L.R.

Abstract

Objectives. We explored insurers' perceptions regarding barriers to reimbursement for oral rapid HIV testing and other preventive screenings during dental care. Methods. We conducted semistructured interviews between April and October 2010 with a targeted sample of 13 dental insurance company executives and consultants, whose firms' cumulative market share exceeded 50% of US employer-based dental insurance markets. Participants represented viewpoints from a significant share of the dental insurance industry. Results. Some preventive screenings, such as for oral cancer, received widespread insurer support and reimbursement. Others, such as population-based HIV screening, appeared to face many barriers to insurance reimbursement. The principal barriers were minimal employer demand, limited evidence of effectiveness and return on investment specific to dental settings, implementation and organizational constraints, lack of provider training, and perceived lack of patient acceptance. Conclusions. The dental setting is a promising venue for preventive screenings, and addressing barriers to insurance reimbursement for such services is a key challenge for public health policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Feinstein-Winitzer, R.T. & Pollack, H.A. & Parish, C.L. & Pereyra, M.R. & Abel, S.N. & Metsch, L.R., 2014. "Insurer views on reimbursement of preventive services in the dental setting: Results from a qualitative study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(5), pages 881-887.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2013.301825_1
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301825
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2013.301825_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.