IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2009.168526_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generating political priority to tackle health disparities: A case study in the Dutch city of the Hague

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, M.
  • Joosen, I.
  • Kunst, A.E.
  • Klazinga, N.S.
  • Stronks, K.

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to study the factors that determined the success of a recent initiative to generate political priority for the problem of health disparities in the city of The Hague, the Netherlands. Methods. Our study had a prospective design. The qualitative data collection included interviews, document analyses, and observations. Results. Crucial for the success of this initiative was the presence of powerful and credible actors. These actors effectively presented scientific evidence on health disparities and framed the issue in the light of shared values, priorities, and policy principles. Finally, their actions were supported by the national context, including the availability of national scientific research on health disparities. Conclusions. The project in The Hague shows that political priority for tackling health disparities can be generated at a local level. Key factors included framing the issue in the light of shared values and framing the problem and the solution as in line with existing policy principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, M. & Joosen, I. & Kunst, A.E. & Klazinga, N.S. & Stronks, K., 2010. "Generating political priority to tackle health disparities: A case study in the Dutch city of the Hague," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(S1), pages 210-215.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2009.168526_3
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.168526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2009.168526
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2009.168526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2009.168526_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.