IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/jahsss/2018p93-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The number of virtual learning environment and their effective using impact on students’ information literacy

Author

Listed:
  • Pan Xiaoyun

    (College of Liberal Arts, Wenzhou-Kean University, Zhejiang, China)

  • Mao Siqi

    (College of Liberal Arts, Wenzhou-Kean University, Zhejiang, China)

Abstract

Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) is becoming an essential method adopted in university education. However, university students perform differently in VLE required courses. A number of students are likely to achieve less with the help of VLE, which initially is designed to offer assistance from a pedagogic perspective. This research studied the relationship between VLE and university students’ information literacy from two aspects: the number of VLE platforms’ influence on students’ information literacy; the quality and quantity of sources students tend to search and use in VLE required course. University students’ different information literacy levels result in varying degree of acceptance in VLE required environments; also, the various VLE involved environments have some interrelationship with students. The researchers predicted that if the number of VLE platforms students could access is higher, then higher information literacy level university students would reach. Students’ information literacy levels could be evaluated by the quality and quantity of their sources. However, the relationships between the number of VLE platform, students’ information literacy, and the source quality and quantity are not simply pairwise correlation. The research was located in Zhejiang, China; 160 students from five universities were randomly selected to participate in the study. Both questionnaire and interview were conducted in the case study to collect relevant data. The data analysis exhibited that the number of VLE platform accessible for students on campus has a weak positive correlation; however, students’ familiarity with a certain number of different VLE platforms is relatively more influential on students’ information literacy level.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan Xiaoyun & Mao Siqi, 2018. "The number of virtual learning environment and their effective using impact on students’ information literacy," Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh, vol. 4(2), pages 93-103.
  • Handle: RePEc:apb:jahsss:2018:p:93-103
    DOI: 10.20474/jahss-4.2.4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-jahss4.2.4.php
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/Jahss-4.2.4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/jahss-4.2.4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Marriote Ngwaru ˆ—, 2017. "Multi-Literacies Pedagogy Design: The Case Of Focused Ethnographic Research And Catalytic Validity In Literacy Development," International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, vol. 3(2), pages 31-43.
    2. Misnaton Rabah & Hamidah Yusof & Marinah Awang, 2016. "Model Of Hope: Leading Learning Among The Indigenous Orang Asli Students," International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12.
    3. Hasmaini Hashim & Sazilah Salam & Siti Nurul Mahfuzah Mohamad, 2017. "Investigating learning styles for adaptive Massaive Open Online Cource (MOOC) learning," Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh, vol. 3(5), pages 282-292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhamad Faisal Ashaari ˆ—, 2017. "The Adoption And Adaptation Of Online Learning Models In The Framework Of Online Da’Wah," International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8.
    2. Siti Nurul Mahfuzah Mohamad∗ & Nur Syafiatun Safwana Sazali & Mohd Azran Mohd Salleh, 2018. "Gamification Approach in Education to Increase Learning Engagement," International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, vol. 4(1), pages 22-32.
    3. Tomoshige Kudo & Keita Nishioka & Akira Nakamura, 2018. "Evaluation for e-Learning Website of Physics by Browsing Path Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Access Log," Journal of ICT, Design, Engineering and Technological Science, Juhriyansyah Dalle, vol. 2(1), pages 16-22.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jahsss:2018:p:93-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/12 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.