IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v5y2018i2p110-117id32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opinions of Science Teachers for Classroom Management

Author

Listed:
  • Ulas Kubat
  • Nurhak Cem Dedebali

Abstract

This study investigates science teachers' concerns about how to achieve effective classroom management, with particular reference to classroom communication, student motivation, physical environments and unwanted student behaviors. A qualitative research method is used in this research. The semi-structured interview form is developed by the researchers as a data collection tool. The study group consists of fourteen science teachers who are working in Mugla province of Turkey, in the academic year of 2015-2016. According to the research findings, participating teachers have linked effective classroom communications to such aspects as student participation and a democratic and sincere classroom environment. In addition, they have also stated that effective classroom management are linked to the following: proper material usage, asking questions, feeling the importance of lessons, physical environment, laboratory environment, a U-shaped seating plan, use of an interactive whiteboard, verbal warnings to correct undesirable behaviors, trying to understand the causes of problems, giving responsibility, establishing eye contact, proper punishments, interviewing parents, guiding teachers and sending students to principal’s room.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulas Kubat & Nurhak Cem Dedebali, 2018. "Opinions of Science Teachers for Classroom Management," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 110-117.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:5:y:2018:i:2:p:110-117:id:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/32/27
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/32/1060
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:5:y:2018:i:2:p:110-117:id:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.