IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v12y2025i3p355-364id6900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial intelligence in higher education: Ethical and pedagogical challenges and the role of public policies

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Jesús Torres-Gordillo
  • Carolina Sanhueza

Abstract

This article examines AI use in early and primary education, identifying ethical and pedagogical challenges for equitable policies. It also highlights research gaps on how technologies such as chatbots worsen educational inequalities, especially across gender and socioeconomic contexts and emphasizes the need for regulations ensuring responsible AI use. This is a non-experimental, cross-sectional, ex post facto quantitative study. The sample consisted of 252 university students with a margin of error of 3.21%. A 45-item questionnaire focused on chatbots was used to assess knowledge, use, and perceptions of AI. McDonald’s omega reliability coefficient was above 0.82 across all four dimensions. Descriptive, correlational, and inferential analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS v26. Results indicate that students perceive chatbots as useful for organising ideas and retrieving information although concerns exist about overreliance. Significant gender and degree programme differences were found (p < 0.05 and d > 0.4) with male primary education students showing greater familiarity with and use of AI. This familiarity positively correlates with improvements in idea organisation suggesting an impact on academic performance. The conclusions call for equitable public policies and adequate teacher training to prevent AI from deepening educational inequalities, especially among women and students from vulnerable backgrounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Jesús Torres-Gordillo & Carolina Sanhueza, 2025. "Artificial intelligence in higher education: Ethical and pedagogical challenges and the role of public policies," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 12(3), pages 355-364.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:3:p:355-364:id:6900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/6900/3019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:3:p:355-364:id:6900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.