IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v12y2025i2p306-319id6894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing e-learning readiness in the context of a higher education institution: Teaching staff perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ashraf Ahmed Fadelelmoula

Abstract

The lack of an adequate e-learning readiness assessment has been characterized as a major cause of e-learning implementation failure. Consequently, overcoming the challenges leading to such failure requires the academic institution to carefully assess its readiness and make improvements based on the identified weaknesses. In response to this requirement, this study primarily focused on assessing the level of e-learning readiness for a Saudi public higher education institution, considering the perceptions of teaching staff. A questionnaire-based survey method was employed to conduct this assessment. A total of 233 valid responses were analyzed. The results demonstrated that all readiness dimensions examined for the institution had a readiness level higher than the expected level of readiness (i.e., 3.41) and less than the lower limit of the highest readiness level range (i.e., 4.2 to 5). These dimensions related to the preparedness of five crucial components within the institution: teaching staff, technology, business processes, finance, and leadership. Based on the obtained results, it is necessary to improve certain aspects of these dimensions to enhance their contribution to the overall sustainable readiness of the institution. Accordingly, the study recommended several areas for improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashraf Ahmed Fadelelmoula, 2025. "Assessing e-learning readiness in the context of a higher education institution: Teaching staff perspective," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 12(2), pages 306-319.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:306-319:id:6894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/6894/3014
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:306-319:id:6894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.