IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v12y2025i2p219-230id6754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domain-specific epistemological beliefs’ expression in initial teacher education: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Margarida Barros
  • Isabel Mesquita
  • Cristiana Bessa
  • Paula Queiros

Abstract

This systematic review examines how preservice teachers’ (PSTs) domain-specific epistemological beliefs (EB) are studied and understood within initial teacher education (ITE) with attention to theoretical, contextual, and methodological aspects. Findings from 24 empirical studies published up to 2024 were synthesized. The review analyzed theoretical frameworks, research designs, and tools commonly used to explore PSTs’ EB across specific domains. Cross-study evaluations are challenging due to the ambiguity created by the lack of justification for framework selection, although the variety of theoretical lenses enhances the field. Similarly, methodological preferences such as the dominance of quantitative and cross-sectional studies using closed questionnaires offer generalizable insights but limit the depth of understanding regarding EB development. Nevertheless, specific contexts of ITE were identified as catalysts for developing EB, and some EB were seen as key predictors of student-centered teaching practices. The field shows theoretical and methodological fragmentation but offers insights into how ITE might influence EB. Bridging current gaps is crucial for a deeper understanding of PSTs' conceptions of knowledge and learning. Recommendations include adopting longitudinal designs, clarifying theoretical foundations, and involving broader ITE stakeholders such as mentors and policymakers whose beliefs also shape teacher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Margarida Barros & Isabel Mesquita & Cristiana Bessa & Paula Queiros, 2025. "Domain-specific epistemological beliefs’ expression in initial teacher education: A systematic review," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 12(2), pages 219-230.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:219-230:id:6754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/6754/2974
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:219-230:id:6754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.