IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v12y2025i1p115-123id6676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the effectiveness of a computerized achievement test using learn smart for psychometric assessment under item response theory

Author

Listed:
  • Mimi Ismail
  • Ahmed Al – Badri
  • Said Al – Senaidi

Abstract

This study aimed to reveal the differences in individuals’ abilities, their standard errors, and the psychometric properties of the test according to the two methods of applying the test (electronic and paper). The descriptive approach was used to achieve the study’s objectives. The study sample consisted of 74 male and female students at the University of Technology and Applied Sciences in Rustaq. An electronic test was built on the Learn Smart platform supported by artificial intelligence in psychological measurement. The results showed no statistically significant differences in the individuals' average ability estimates and their standard errors between the electronic and paper-based tests. Besides, the vocabulary difficulty estimates in the electronic test ranged between -2.562 and 2.007 and the vocabulary difficulty estimates in the paper-based test ranged between -3.483 and 2.194. All of them are within the acceptable range. The chi-square values ​​for the electronic test items are not statistically significant except for items (8 and 10). On the other hand, all chi-square values for the items on the paper test are not statistically significant except the item numbers (3, 6, 8, 10 and 12) which are statistically significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Mimi Ismail & Ahmed Al – Badri & Said Al – Senaidi, 2025. "Evaluating the effectiveness of a computerized achievement test using learn smart for psychometric assessment under item response theory," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 12(1), pages 115-123.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:115-123:id:6676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/6676/2965
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:115-123:id:6676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.