IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v11y2024i2p404-412id5641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workload doesn’t mean exhaustion: Antecedents of teacher burnout

Author

Listed:
  • Vu Dung
  • Vu Thu Trang
  • Nguyen Thi Mai Lan

Abstract

Workload has consistently been found to be a predictor of burnout in teachers. However, while academia considers workload a psychological concept, the public tends to simplify workload as the number of tasks assigned. This study seeks to provide further evidence of the psychological nature of workload by examining if workload understood in terms of quantity of work had any effect on teacher burnout and whether this relationship was moderated by psychological processes such as self-efficacy and mediated by stress. 117 primary and high school teachers holding at least two roles at school participated in the study. Teacher burnout was measured using MBI-ES, self-efficacy was measured by OSTES and stress and workload were measured by single-item questions. Results showed that workload (i.e., the number of roles assigned) did not have a main effect on burnout. Perceived stress and self-efficacy had direct effects on teacher burnout: stress increased burnout while self-efficacy reduced burnout. Self-efficacy had a significant moderation effect on workload-burnout interaction. Workload increased burnout only in teachers with low self-efficacy while stress did not moderate the workload-burnout relationship. These findings support the psychological nature of the relationship between workload and burnout among teachers. They also point out the importance of enhancing teacher stress management and self-efficacy in protecting them from burnout.

Suggested Citation

  • Vu Dung & Vu Thu Trang & Nguyen Thi Mai Lan, 2024. "Workload doesn’t mean exhaustion: Antecedents of teacher burnout," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 11(2), pages 404-412.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:404-412:id:5641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/5641/2793
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:404-412:id:5641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.