IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ani/irdjom/v3y2021i1p22-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of a Research Instrument for Safety Leadership and Safety Knowledge-Attitude-Behaviour (KAB) for Malaysia Manufacturing Set-Up

Author

Listed:
  • Syazwan Syah Zulkifly

    (School of Business Management,Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Rafee Baharudin

    (Department of Community Health, Facultyof Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Razif Mahadi

    (Department of Biological & AgriculturalEngineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Sharifah Norkhadijah Syed Ismail

    (Department Environmental and Occupational Health, Facultyof Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Nor Halim Hasan

    (Department of Occupational Safety & Health,Ministry of Human ResourceMalaysia, Malaysia)

Abstract

This article provide an empirical evidence on the validity of a questionnaire designed to assess safety leadership, as well as safety knowledge-attitude-behaviour (Safety KAB) within Malaysia’s manufacturers which fall under small and medium (S & M) entrepreneurship. The questionnaire’s items were adapted from earlier research conducted in other study contexts. First, modified fuzzy delphi method (FDM) was applied for the research to obtain expert’s consensus regarding the content validity of all items. With some modifications to suit Malaysia’s SME manufacturing setting, the 5 point Likert-scale questionnaire consisting 42 items for measuring safety leadership and safety KAB were finalised. Subsequently, it was distributed to 100 production operators from the manufacturing S& M enterrpises in the Northern Corridor Economic Region (NCER) of Malaysia for pilot testing, 95 respondents had answered. They returned the questionnaires and 89 were best to be chosen for further procedures.The determined Cronbach’s alpha values were more than 0.90 for all items representing those variables, indicating that the questionnaire possessed high reliability and internal consistency. Subsequently, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) employing principal component analysis (PCA) extraction and varimax rotation was performed to determine the construct validity. According to the PCA results, each item was retained as all the factor loadings were above the decided cut-off value, which is 0.65. Henceforth, the questionnaire is considered valid and reliabile to be used by future researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Syazwan Syah Zulkifly & Mohd Rafee Baharudin & Muhammad Razif Mahadi & Sharifah Norkhadijah Syed Ismail & Nor Halim Hasan, 2021. "Validation of a Research Instrument for Safety Leadership and Safety Knowledge-Attitude-Behaviour (KAB) for Malaysia Manufacturing Set-Up," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 3(1), pages 22-34, june.
  • Handle: RePEc:ani:irdjom:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:22-34
    DOI: 10.52131/jom.2021.0301.0023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.internationalrasd.org/index.php/jom/article/view/229
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.internationalrasd.org/index.php/jom/article/view/229/153
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.52131/jom.2021.0301.0023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Syamsiah Mokhtar & Ruhizan Muhamad Yasin, 2018. "Design of Teaching Influences the Training Transfer Amongst TVET’s Instructors: Fuzzy Delphi Technique," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(6), pages 1083-1097, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ani:irdjom:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:22-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pranav Kumar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.internationalrasd.org/index.php/jom/index .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.