IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Views Of English Language Teachers On The Affective Domain Of Language Teaching In Turkey


  • Belgin Aydin

    () (Anadolu University)


While the characteristics of an effective teacher vary depending on different views, everybody would agree that a teacher who ignores the affective domain cannot be considered effective. Previous studies in the area mainly focused on the cognitive side of the learning process. Although some studies focused on the affect, they studied it from the learners’ perspectives and ignored the teachers’. This study aims to reveal the perceptions of Turkish ELT teachers on the affective domain of language teaching. Teachers’ views were identified considering their teaching experience –expert vs. novice teachers- and teaching context –state vs. private schools-. They were also asked the reasons –if they had any- for not addressing the affect in their classes. The results revealed that Turkish EFL teachers give importance to the affective side and their perceptions do not differ according to their teaching experience or context. School context, students, teachers and environmental factors were reported as the main reasons for not addressing the affective side.

Suggested Citation

  • Belgin Aydin, 2009. "Views Of English Language Teachers On The Affective Domain Of Language Teaching In Turkey," Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, vol. 9(1), pages 263-280, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:9:y:2009:i:1:p:263-280

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    teachers' perceptions; affective domain of language teaching; expert and novice teachers; state and private school contexts.;

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:9:y:2009:i:1:p:263-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Social Sciences Institute). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.