IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/and/journl/v4y2004i2p73-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Railway Passangers’Satisfaction and an Application

Author

Listed:
  • Kemal Poyraz
  • Ercan Taskin
  • Hakan Kara

    (Dumlupinar University)

Abstract

In this study to evaluate the railway passengers’ satisfaction with TCDD (Turkish Government Railways), various survey based analyses have been used. In addition to the theoretical framework and the information about TCDD, a survey has been carried out and presented in this study. Survey questions especially focus on the reasonable aspects of the subjects and the survey used in this article is a f›eld study. Using the survey method, tables, all of which are related to TCDD, have been used in the article and they have been compared with the numerical data. Six hundred questionnaire forms have been handed out to railway passengers. As for as the time and cost is concerned, number of the forms has been kept limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Kemal Poyraz & Ercan Taskin & Hakan Kara, 2004. "Evaluation of the Railway Passangers’Satisfaction and an Application," Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, vol. 4(2), pages 73-88, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:4:y:2004:i:2:p:73-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.anadolu.edu.tr/arastirma/hakemli_dergiler/sosyal_bilimler/pdf/2004-2/sos_bil.6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Turkish Goverment Railways; Satisfaction; Passanger; Customer.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • L92 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:4:y:2004:i:2:p:73-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Social Sciences Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iianatr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.