IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/and/journl/v2y2002i1p109-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Comparison of Two Diffrent Feedback Methods Utilized During the Practicum Courses In Special Education Teacher Training Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Dilek Erbas
  • Serife Yucesoy

    (Anadolu University)

Abstract

In this study, the effectiveness of immediate and delayed feedback procedures were compared on the acquisition of systematic instruction skills by three students who were attending a teacher training program for the mentally retarded. An adapted alternating treatments design was used to compare the effectiveness of these two techniques. The appropriate use of reinforcements and the appropriate use of instructional prompts were identified as systematic instruction skills. The results of the study indicated that immediate feedback procedure was more effective than delayed feedback procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Dilek Erbas & Serife Yucesoy, 2002. "The Comparison of Two Diffrent Feedback Methods Utilized During the Practicum Courses In Special Education Teacher Training Programs," Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, vol. 2(1), pages 109-120, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:2:y:2002:i:1:p:109-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.anadolu.edu.tr/arastirma/hakemli_dergiler/sosyal_bilimler/pdf/2002-1/sos_bil.7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Special Education Teacher; Systematic Instruction; Student Teachers; Behavioral Supervision.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z00 - Other Special Topics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:2:y:2002:i:1:p:109-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Social Sciences Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iianatr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.