Perceptions of Preparers from Romanian Banks Regarding IFRS Application
Starting 1 January 2012, credit institutions are required to apply the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as basis of accounting for the preparation of the individual financial statements. Regulatory reforms were done and banks prepared to face the transition process. In this context, the aim of our study is to investigate, the perceptions of the main actors from banks (responsible with the transition process) on the cost and benefits involved by the use of IFRS as reporting standards (implementation strategy used by some banks before 2012) and on the peculiarities related to the application of IFRS as accounting basis (each transaction or event being recorded following IFRS requirements) immediately after 1st January 2012. We intended to investigate also if the transition process changed the attitude of banks towards the application of IFRS. We observed that preparers still have a positive attitude towards the application of IFRS considering that the cost benefit report is a positive one. Not all preparers are convinced that the conversion will lower the cost of capital. The complex nature of IFRS, the insufficient application guidance and the necessity to adapt to frequent changes of IFRSs were considered as difficulties related to IFRS reporting. Double reporting costs reduction and eliminating confusions by publishing two sets of financial statements were considered unanimously benefits of using IFRS as basis of accounting. It resulted that most preparers are concerned about the costs involved by the modification of internal evidence systems, the necessity to satisfy multiple reporting requirements (accounting, prudential and fiscal), the impact on prudential indicators and the insufficient resources allocated to this process. The most important cost was related to the modification of actual IT systems. The impairment methodology described by IAS 39 was rated as most challenging by preparers.
Volume (Year): 11 (2012)
Issue (Month): 2 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:11:y:2012:i:2:p:191-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Cristina Geambasu)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Cristina Geambasu to update the entry or send us the correct email address
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.