IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Assessment Of The Common Agricultural Policy Reform After 2013 From - Point Of View Of Polish Agriculture

Listed author(s):
  • Bazyli Czyzewski

    (Poznan University of Economics Poland)

  • Sebastian Stepien

    (Poznan University of Economics Poland)

The evolution of the Common Agricultural Policy is marked by distinct graduality. Thefirst stage was subject to food self-sufficiency priority, the second was clearly of a pro-demandcharacter. The third stage, related to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform after 2013, isdistinguished by changes in the model of the agricultural sector products consumption, and takesinto account usefulnesses connected with the well-being of the natural environment and provision ofpublic goods. The aim of this article is to point out proposals of changes in the EU agriculturalpolicy, especially in the scope of the direct subsidies mechanism, from the point of view of thebenefits for rural areas in Poland. The authors indicate that the utmost pro-efficiency andmodernization orientation of the 1st and 2nd pillar of CAP within current institutional frameworks isin the interest of the Polish agriculture.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia in its journal Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica.

Volume (Year): 2 (2012)
Issue (Month): 14 ()
Pages: 1-27

in new window

Handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:2:y:2012:i:14:p:27
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:2:y:2012:i:14:p:27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dan-Constantin Danuletiu)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.