IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Profit And Loss Account In Different Approaches. Advantages And Disadvantages

Listed author(s):
  • Man Mariana

    (University of Petrosani)

  • Gadau Liana

    (Spiru Haret University Bucharest)

Registered author(s):

    The evolution, the development of increasingly complex activities emphasizes the utility,the necessity of the profit and loss account in the financial reporting by increasing the interest in theenterprise performance, especially for the dynamic information that this situation can provide.In this paper we propose to approach the profit and loss account in view of two representativereferential, namely in terms of IAS 1 standard The preparation and presentation of the financialstatements and the European Accounting Directives, aiming to emphasize the advantages, but also thelimits provided by this models. This way, will see which of these models of profit and loss accountrespond best to users’ needs. In the second part of the paper, we present the model for the profit andloss account proposed by the economist RJ Thacker. This model shows interest in terms of efficiency ofenterprise management. Even if this model has its limits, it deserves to be analysis thorough anelaborate study.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia in its journal Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica.

    Volume (Year): 1 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 12 ()
    Pages: 1-13

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2010:i:12:p:13
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2010:i:12:p:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dan-Constantin Danuletiu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.