Author
Abstract
This research aimed to determine the state's secondary school teachers' readiness for the PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) to address the mathematics-related "PISA gap." A quantitative descriptive-comparative research design was used to evaluate teachers' perceptions on three different dimensions: instructional leadership, collaborative practice and resource availability, and administrative readiness; as well as how actively involved they are in implementing PISA. More than 100 teachers completed the survey, with 60% having 10 or more years of experience and 60% holding master's or doctoral degrees. The results indicated that while nearly all teachers have high levels of collaborative and data-driven practices, they reported significant barriers with respect to the provision of resources, specifically in terms of the availability of internet-based connectivity (at both the school and local government levels) that would prevent or minimize the use of digital assessments promptly. In addition, the teachers indicated that they have not established standardized strategies to involve parents or guardians in attaining PISA goals; therefore, the level of parental involvement in the PISA-related process was the lowest of the four dimensions. Additionally, while there were no significant differences in perceived PISA readiness by rank or highest level of education attained, the number of years of teaching experience was statistically significant in influencing teachers' perceptions of stakeholder involvement. As a result, the authors developed a multi-faceted Mathematics Action Plan (MAP) called VIBA (Vitalizing Instruction, Building Alliances) that they plan to implement to address these areas of concern through collaborative professional development/training on the use of PISA and stronger partnerships with the community.
Suggested Citation
George M. Viba, 2026.
"Bridging the PISA Gap: Assessing Teacher Perceptions and Developing a Mathematics Action Plan,"
Journal of Learning and Development Studies, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 6(6), pages 21-34, April.
Handle:
RePEc:alk:jlds00:v:6:y:2026:i:6:id:12604
DOI: 10.32996/jlds.2026.6.6.3
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jlds00:v:6:y:2026:i:6:id:12604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jlds .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.