Author
Listed:
- Mustafa M. Bodrick
(Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia; MAHSA University, Malaysia; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA)
- Mutlaq Almutairi
(King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)
- Mohammed I. Alassaf
(Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)
- Lobna A. Aljuffali
(Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)
- Mohammed Y. Alrasi
(Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)
- Abdullah A. Alhawas
(Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)
- Aws A. Obaid
(Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)
- Mohammed I. Alsuhaim
(Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)
- Ibrahim M. Alhabib
(Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)
- Abdulrahman K. Albisher
(Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)
Abstract
This focus of this paper is on understanding historical and critical viewpoints that facilitate learning for effective outcomes in adult education plans. It is shown that inclusive and participatory methods are useful for promoting lifelong learning. It highlights professional ideas that support learning methods that empower learners’ knowledge development and eliminate structural barriers to learning. The iterative process of discovery reflects the movement between interactive sessions with next generation leaders and evidence in the literature that emerged as a comprehensive literature review and analysis. The analysis indicates that leaders, educators, and other professionals should be facilitating and promoting professional conversations from a learner-centered perspective since they enable learners to embrace self-direction in growth and learning. Through the approach, educators emphasize learners’ strengths and experiences, while implementing team discussions, peer coaching, and mentorship programs. This paper illustrates that learning space metaphors such as campfire, watering hole, cave, life, and holodeck, are essential for establishing flexible learning environments that enhance knowledge development through vivid imagery among learners. It indicates that, while each metaphor signifies a specific educational process, combining the concepts improves learning by making it more collaborative as learners can participate in imaginative activities and problem-solving tasks in a collaborative approach that promotes research. Furthermore, it illustrates that Thornburg’s learning spaces can also be incorporated into collaborative education frameworks to improve learner-centered engagement. The experiential utilization shows that the purpose of Thornburg’s learning spaces is to create intentional teaching and learning practices that require facilitators and mentors to go beyond what is familiar and apply risk-taking techniques such as dynamic interaction in teaching and learning processes. A review of cooperative and experiential learning in this paper also shows that they form the foundation for co-learning, co-thinking, co-mentoring, and co-creating in education processes. It is demonstrated that cooperative and experiential learning concepts align with the core principles of adult education, emphasizing practical application and purposeful reciprocal engagement. As learners contribute to creating study materials and designing learning activities, they facilitate co-creation to improve their interactions with educators. A review of co-transforming and co-innovating concepts in education also indicates that they are effective methods of enhancing leadership capabilities. This paper illustrates that co-transforming methods foster transformative learning related to real-life situations, encouraging participants in professional conversations to become change agents within a transformation ecosystem. It also illustrates that components of co-innovating can be established by acquiring new ideas, conscientiously managing shared knowledge, and effectively implementing creative concepts. This review demonstrates that co-learning approaches reflect the constructivist philosophy even though they are novel methods. It indicates that the constructivist theory can be applied in learning processes since it inspires learners to engage actively in educational tasks. This paper also highlights research findings demonstrating the effectiveness of professional discussions in leadership and educational contexts due to their dynamic applicability. It encourages professionals to gain extensive awareness of the intentional decision-making for effective teaching and leadership. It also emphasizes the need for future professionals to adopt and maintain practices that reflect learner-centeredness. The report concludes by stressing the importance of combining professional conversations with deliberate and intentional activities and discussion as an effective strategy for educating adult learners. Such an education approach encompasses discussions that foster teamwork, critical thinking, and reflective thought among learners that culminate in a transforming mindset.
Suggested Citation
Mustafa M. Bodrick & Mutlaq Almutairi & Mohammed I. Alassaf & Lobna A. Aljuffali & Mohammed Y. Alrasi & Abdullah A. Alhawas & Aws A. Obaid & Mohammed I. Alsuhaim & Ibrahim M. Alhabib & Abdulrahman K. , 2025.
"Innovative Learning Spaces and the Creative Use of Professional Conversations in Leadership Capability Advancement,"
Journal of Learning and Development Studies, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 5(2), pages 09-14, May.
Handle:
RePEc:alk:jlds00:v:5:y:2025:i:2:id:9492
DOI: 10.32996/jlds.2025.5.2.2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jlds00:v:5:y:2025:i:2:id:9492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jlds .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.