IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alk/ijllt0/v3y2020i5id1069.html

Trump's Strategies in the First Presidential Debate: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Quang Nhat Nguyen

    (Lecturer of English and Head of Academics of The IELTS Workshop, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education, Vietnam)

  • Murad Hassan Mohammed Sawalmeh

    (Assistant Professor of Linguistics and Translation Studies, Dhofar University, Oman)

Abstract

The young and vibrant 243-year-old U.S. has long claimed its status as a world power. As stated by the U.S.'s Congressional Research Service (2019), the U.S. shoulders the responsibility of defending and promoting freedom, democracy, and universal values, which means that America, being an active internationalist global leader, a superpower, and a world policeman, has been maintaining the power of manipulating partially, if not most, the whole world. This attention gains more significance as Donald Trump aims to take center stage once more in the presidential campaign in 2020. The way Americans choose their presidents will affect the world situation in many respects. While it is noticeable that there is an anti-intellectual trend in presidential discourse (Lim, 2008), Trump's presidential linguistic style is highly distinctive in terms of its simplicity, anti-elitism, and collectivism (Oliver & Rahn, 2016). Realizing the importance of Donald Trump's linguistic presidential style, the attention that it drew, and the likelihood that Trump may reuse his approach in the 2020 presidential campaign, this study focuses on the first presidential debate's strategies of Donald Trump in 2016. The analysis of the debate's strategies is influenced by the works of Fairclough (1993), Halliday (1971) and Goffman (1967). The results of the study revealed that Trump combined four strategies of presidential debates, including (1) self-acclamation, (2) describing opposing candidates through the verbal attack, (3) self-rectification or image-enhancement through the defense against opposing candidates' blaming argument, and (4) extra-vocalization. Trump's presidential speech is a source of valuable knowledge that makes use of both typical candidates' traditional strategies with a more business-oriented approach. It is hoped that this study might be a valuable foundation on which researchers can rely to consider Trump's changes in linguistic style when he comes to the upcoming presidential campaigns in 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Quang Nhat Nguyen & Murad Hassan Mohammed Sawalmeh, 2020. "Trump's Strategies in the First Presidential Debate: A Critical Discourse Analysis," International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 3(5), pages 68-77, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:alk:ijllt0:v:3:y:2020:i:5:id:1069
    DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.5.8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijllt/article/view/1069
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijllt/article/download/1069/868
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.5.8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:ijllt0:v:3:y:2020:i:5:id:1069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijllt .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.