IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alk/bjtep0/v4y2025i2id9493.html

Approaching the Construction of Arguments in Postgraduate Education Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa M. Bodrick

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia; MAHSA University, Malaysia; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA)

  • Mutlaq Almutairi

    (King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)

  • Aws A. Obaid

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed Y. Alrasi

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ibrahim M. Alhabib

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdullah A. Alhawas

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hani M. Alqarni

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Constructing arguments, applying logical reasoning, and developing intellectual skills are fundamental to academic success in postgraduate education and qualitative research. The study objective of this paper aims at critically analyzing argument construction, logical reasoning, and intellectual skill development as fundamental components of postgraduate education and qualitative research. The analysis highlights the importance of these elements in fostering critical engagement, advancing knowledge, and contributing to scholarly discourse. The paper draws on academic literature to offer a nuanced interpretation of these interconnected dimensions and explores strategies to enhance argumentation, reasoning, and intellectual skills in postgraduate education. The analysis supports that logical reasoning is the cornerstone of effective argumentation, offering systematic methods to connect premises to conclusions. Deductive reasoning is highlighted for its role in hypothesis testing and causal analysis, ensuring precise and reliable conclusions. Inductive reasoning, a bottom-up approach, uncovers patterns and trends from specific observations, proving essential for theory development and exploratory research. Abductive reasoning facilitates plausible explanations for poorly defined phenomena, while retroductive reasoning identifies underlying causes to generate alternative theoretical models. Results of the assessment also emphasize the need for postgraduate students to develop intellectual skills, including critical thinking, synthesis, and dialectic reasoning. It is confirmed that constructing arguments, applying logical reasoning, and developing intellectual skills are essential for postgraduate education Future research should explore innovative strategies to support argument construction, interdisciplinary collaboration, and intellectual growth, ensuring the continued evolution of postgraduate education and academic inquiry.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa M. Bodrick & Mutlaq Almutairi & Aws A. Obaid & Mohammed Y. Alrasi & Ibrahim M. Alhabib & Abdullah A. Alhawas & Hani M. Alqarni, 2025. "Approaching the Construction of Arguments in Postgraduate Education Programs," British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Developments, vol. 4(2), pages 10-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:alk:bjtep0:v:4:y:2025:i:2:id:9493
    DOI: 10.32996/bjtep.2025.4.2.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/bjtep/article/view/9493
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/bjtep/article/download/9493/8151
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32996/bjtep.2025.4.2.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:bjtep0:v:4:y:2025:i:2:id:9493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/bjtep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.