IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alk/bjtep0/v4y2025i2id8997.html

Navigating Emotional and Professional Challenges in Remote Teaching: Examining Teacher Well-Being, Burnout, and Socio-Emotional Learning Through the Job Demands-Resources Model

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Boison

    (Director, Centre for Learning and Teaching Innovation, Aurora College, Canada)

  • Anne Burke

    (Professor, Faculty of Education, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to an abrupt shift to online learning, significantly increasing both the professional and emotional demands placed on educators. This qualitative case study examines the experiences of seven elementary school staff members in Newfoundland and Labrador who participated in the ADVOST project, focusing on how they navigated the challenges of remote instruction and the coping strategies they employed to maintain their well-being. Grounded in the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model, this study explores how high job demands—including increased workload, digital adaptation, and the emotional labour of student support—affected teacher well-being and how job resources helped mitigate stress and sustain engagement. Findings indicate that emotional exhaustion and burnout were prevalent, particularly due to the blurring of professional and personal boundaries, extended work hours, and the need for continuous student support. However, educators also demonstrated resilience through strategic adaptation, drawing on peer collaboration, professional experience, and structured socio-emotional learning (SEL) practices to manage stress. SEL emerged as a critical job resource, helping educators regulate emotions, sustain motivation, and foster engagement in digital learning environments. Educators who incorporated structured emotional check-ins, student engagement strategies, and relational pedagogy reported greater well-being and job satisfaction. Despite these benefits, formal SEL-focused professional development was inconsistent, with many educators relying on self-directed learning rather than structured institutional training. Beyond individual strategies, the study highlights the importance of institutional support in fostering sustainable teaching environments. Educators who had access to professional collaboration, administrative backing, and clear policies on workload management were better positioned to navigate remote instruction. As digital and hybrid learning models continue to shape the future of education, this study calls for evidence-based, SEL-focused professional development initiatives that provide practical strategies for managing emotional labor, preventing burnout, and strengthening teacher resilience. By situating teacher well-being alongside instructional effectiveness, this research contributes to Canadian and international discussions on educator sustainability, offering actionable solutions for improving institutional support, professional learning opportunities, and long-term resilience in digital education settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Boison & Anne Burke, 2025. "Navigating Emotional and Professional Challenges in Remote Teaching: Examining Teacher Well-Being, Burnout, and Socio-Emotional Learning Through the Job Demands-Resources Model," British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Developments, vol. 4(2), pages 15-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:alk:bjtep0:v:4:y:2025:i:2:id:8997
    DOI: 10.32996/bjtep.2025.4.2.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/bjtep/article/view/8997
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/bjtep/article/download/8997/8204
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32996/bjtep.2025.4.2.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:bjtep0:v:4:y:2025:i:2:id:8997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/bjtep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.