IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/akt/journl/v15y2020i2p136-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patent Analysis and Public Policy in the Field of Intellectual Property

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Klypin
  • Sergey Vyunov

    (Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

Abstract

Introduction. The level of technological development of a country is determined by many factors, including the practical application of scientific discoveries. Monitoring patent information, including the country of the patent applicant or recipient, allows us to identify the activity of R&D personnel on the IP market, their bias for certain research areas and research topics, as well as recognize research areas expecting innovative products in the near future. In many cases, in Russia indicators of patent activity also suggest the general trend of scientific and technological development. In light of this they are generally used to make strategic decisions at the federal level in identifying promising key areas of scientific and technical activity, though in a simplified form. We believe, that this approach requires consideration and critical analysis in view of the fact that the nature and prospects of scientific and technical activity are determined by the multiplicity of different factors including personnel, technical, organizational, institutional and other components. Methods. The research is based on methods of retrospective and comparative analysis of data in the field of patent activity in Russia and foreign countries, as well as deductive and inductive analysis of the works of other authors of the research subject. The analysis of the number of patent applications and patents granted for inventions in Russia and globally is based on data from the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for 2014–2018. Results and Discussion. Analysis of patenting dynamics in 35 technological areas of WIPO in Russia and in the world in retrospect for 5 years is made. The analysis of the number of patent applications of the leading countries according to the WIPO allowed to establish that in Russia, patent activity in a number of technological areas corresponds to global trends in patenting. Several technological areas that are not leaders in the number of patents granted on the world level show the greatest patent activity in Russia. At the same time, the results of the study indicate that the topics of the most active WIPO technology areas in terms of volume both in Russia and in the world as a whole do not fully correspond to the topics of technological areas designated as priority technologies in the SNTR Strategy and reflected as “cross-cutting” technologies of National technology initiative. The necessity of revising approaches to the implementation of the public scientific and technological policy in the sphere of intellectual property and the implementation of technological development priorities is justified, taking into account not only the dynamics of patent activity and global trends in technological development, but also the multiplicity of factors of socio-economic and scientific-technological development. In article there are the suggestions for adjustments to the main tools of the public scientific and technological policy in the sphere of intellectual property reflected in the National Project “Science”, with the need to take into account the requests of organizations in the real sector of the economy, the effectiveness of technological activities, the state of the existing scientific and technological potential of the regions, its industry and corporate features. A predictive model {A; B; C; (...); n} = f (H; P; F; Ind; Inf; Ext) for forecasting the values of indicators related to the development of the sphere of intellectual property and taken into account in the government program “Scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation” is proposed. The model takes into account the following factors: human resources, effectiveness of intellectual activity (patenting), financial resources, development of the economy by industry, research infrastructure, situation in the world economy, as well as dynamics of patenting in other countries (external influences). The concept of a technological atlas is revealed. The technological atlas is presented as a systematic map that, in a thematic, sectoral and corporate context, gives statistical information about the results of scientific and technological development, and the scientific and technical potential by regions of the country. Conclusion. Patent analysis is a tool for a comprehensive study of the existing backlogs of organizations, regions, countries or the world as a whole in relation to technological areas. Taking into account the multiplicity of different factors of scientific and technological development allows us to critically look at the measures implemented as the part of public scientific and technological policy and propose adjustments to the list of public policy instruments in the sphere of intellectual property, as well as the planned values of the relevant indicators reflected in government programs, and at the same time, to forecast promising areas of technological development of various sectors of the economy, individual organizations and firms, taking into account the possibility of new developments and their future commercialization. To select reasonable measures of government support for the sphere of intellectual property at the regional level, a technological atlas can be a work resource, which is included not only retrospective information on patenting trends, but also a number of indicators of scientific and technological development. It will contribute to the formation of reasonable development forecasts relevant to perspective technological areas in various sectors of the economy, taking into account regional specifics.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Klypin & Sergey Vyunov, 2020. "Patent Analysis and Public Policy in the Field of Intellectual Property," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 15(2), pages 136-171, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:136-171
    DOI: 10.33873/2686-6706.2020.15-2.136-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://en.sie-journal.ru/assets/uploads/issues/2020/2(36)_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33873/2686-6706.2020.15-2.136-171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Streltsova, E., 2022. "Global flows of technological knowledge: The position of Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 57(5), pages 39-54.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:136-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lubov Pudovkina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://riep.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.