IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/akt/journl/v13y2018i2p93-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical review of intellectual property in Russia based on WIPO data

Author

Listed:
  • Tatyana Sutyrina

    (Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

Abstract

The review provides the analysis of the Russian patenting activity in international comparison, which was made mainly on the basis of the WIPO statistical data and covers the period 2010–2017. The research task was to assess compliance of Russia’s technological potential with its strategic priorities for science and technology development. The author assumes that technological potential is largely determined by the intellectual property of the country. The position of Russia in the global patent space is analyzed by means of statistical data on patenting within different systems, as well as in the context of distribution of patent applications between the world leading patent offices. Special attention is paid to assessing Russia’s competitiveness in terms of intellectual property in the critical technology fields. It was found that the five leaders in the majority of indicators remains unchanged for the period under review and includes China, the United States, Japan, the Republic of Korea and Germany. However, in recent years, China, Saudi Arabia, India, Turkey and Singapore have been the leaders in the annual growth rate of patent applications, which allows us to predict a further shift of the pole of innovation activity towards Asia. The analysis revealed the relative weakness of Russia’s position in the sphere of intellectual property, and hence the technological potential. There is a significant lag behind the leaders both in terms of patenting activity in general and in a number of industries that are critical for science and technology development. The demand for intellectual property in the country is low, as well as the patenting activity of the domestic business. The author comes to the conclusion that the preservation of the existing achievements and further development of science and technology in Russia are possible only providing accumulation and commercialization of intellectual property in priority technology fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatyana Sutyrina, 2018. "Analytical review of intellectual property in Russia based on WIPO data," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 13(2), pages 93-113, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:93-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://en.sie-journal.ru/assets/uploads/issues/2018/2(28)_05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatyana Chechenkina, 2016. "Russian Science in the Context of Cross-country Comparisons: Review of R&D Efficiency Statistics," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 11(1), pages 125-141, January.
    2. N. G. Kurakova, 2017. "The reflection of the struggle of Russian companies for promising markets in the patent statistics," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 3(1).
    3. Wipo, 2017. "PCT Yearly Review: The International Patent System, 2017 edition," WIPO Economics & Statistics Series, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division, number 2017:901, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wipo, 2017. "World Intellectual Property Report 2017 - Intangible Capital in Global Value Chains," WIPO Economics & Statistics Series, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division, number 2017:944, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:93-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lubov Pudovkina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://riep.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.