IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/akt/journl/v11y2016i1p125-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Russian Science in the Context of Cross-country Comparisons: Review of R&D Efficiency Statistics

Author

Listed:
  • Tatyana Chechenkina

    (Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

Abstract

The publication contains a brief overview of the R & D performance indicators in the developed countries, fastest-growing countries and Russia. This review is the first in a series of publications aiming to locate the Russian Federation on the global science map. It has the focus on patent statistics. The data of OECD, WIPO and the Federal Statistics Service of Russia for the 2003-2013 period are used as the basis for comparisons. The publication contains a detailed analysis of patent activity in high-tech areas. The United States accounts for the largest number of patents received in the field of biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, telecommunications and digital technologies, while the Republic of Korea is most active in the field of information technology management, and Japan in the field of semiconductor manufacturing. At the moment, the Russian R&D sector does not look competitive compared to the leaders. The number of patents received by residents of Russia in the field of computer technology is 1.18% of the number of patents granted to residents of the United States. One of the main problems of Russian science is the low productivity of its corporate sector in comparison with the leading countries: two Chinese corporations issued 6 times more patent applications than applicants from the Russian Federation. The passive balance of payments for technology proves that technologies developed by the Russia’s civil science are not competitive on the global market.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatyana Chechenkina, 2016. "Russian Science in the Context of Cross-country Comparisons: Review of R&D Efficiency Statistics," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 11(1), pages 125-141, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:125-141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://en.sie-journal.ru/assets/uploads/issues/2016/1(19)_08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tatyana Sutyrina, 2018. "Analytical review of intellectual property in Russia based on WIPO data," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 13(2), pages 93-113, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:125-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lubov Pudovkina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://riep.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.