Author
Listed:
- Stacy Stafford
- Magy Martin
- Don Martin
Abstract
This study examined whether personal happiness mediates the association between self-rated mental health and marital satisfaction among U.S. married adults. Addressing an underexplored mechanism, we tested a theoretically grounded mediation model using nationally representative data. The aim was to clarify whether happiness partially accounts for the pathway linking psychological functioning to relationship quality. Guided by Bowen Family Systems Theory, we conducted a quantitative archival analysis of the 2018 General Social Survey (N = 938 married adults). Variables were single-item Likert measures: mental health (HLTHMTNL), happiness (HAPPY), and marital satisfaction (HAPMAR). Analyses used IBM SPSS Statistics Version 29: multiple regression, path analysis, Baron and Kenny steps, and Sobel test; power estimated with G*Power 3.1. Mental health and happiness significantly predicted marital satisfaction (R² = .17). Mental health predicted happiness (b = 0.23, p < .001), and happiness predicted marital satisfaction (b = 0.35, p < .001). The direct effect of mental health on marital satisfaction remained significant but attenuated when controlling for happiness (b = 0.05, p = .011). The Sobel test indicated a significant indirect effect (b = 0.08, z = 8.49, p < .001). Findings support integrating happiness-enhancing strategies within couples counseling, especially when psychological distress is present. Brief positive psychology interventions (gratitude, savoring, acts of kindness) may complement systemic approaches to strengthen dyadic communication and resilience. Routine assessment of subjective happiness can inform case formulation, treatment planning, and progress monitoring in community mental health and private practice settings. To our knowledge, this is the first empirical test of happiness as a mediator between mental health and marital satisfaction using nationally representative U.S. data. The study advances family systems-informed models by quantifying a specific affective pathway and offers practice-relevant evidence for embedding well-being interventions alongside symptom reduction in couple-focused care.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:8:y:2025:i:6:p:8-16:id:515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucía Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.