Author
Abstract
The aim of this study is to present and test a holistic measure of service quality in higher education (HE), specified as a second-order formative-formative measurement model, challenging the inherent assumption of an underlying reflective measurement model. The study further analyzes the effect of perceived service quality on students’ satisfaction and students’ willingness to recommend. We empirically tested our model using secondary data collected through the National Student Enquiry (NSE). We selected data for universities in the Netherlands, containing a net sample of 45,149 undergraduate students. PLS-SEM was used to analyze, evaluate, and validate a second-order formative-formative measurement model for HE service quality and its impact on students’ satisfaction and willingness to recommend the university. The findings reveal that the antecedent structure of the second-order measurement model for service quality is theoretically and empirically supported. Our results further indicate that service quality is a key driver for both students’ satisfaction and their willingness to recommend the university. Research on service quality in HE, specified as a second-order formative-formative measurement model, is scarce. Many higher-order constructs in HE, such as service quality, are specified as reflective measures, where a formative structure might be more appropriate. By analyzing a second-order formative-formative measurement model for perceived service quality in HE, this study contributes to applied quantitative research in higher education. Although we applied our research in the Dutch HE market, our analytical approach is not limited to national borders or the HE market. In many other service contexts (e.g., healthcare, hospitality, automobile repair services, sports clubs, financial services), service quality is often measured reflectively, where a formative structure might be more suitable.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:99-124:id:458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucía Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.