IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajo/ijoest/v8y2025i4p62-74id437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Relative Effectiveness of Professional Development Activities and Dimensions for Elementary School Teachers of English as a Foreign Language

Author

Listed:
  • Ping-Huang Sheu

Abstract

This study employs correspondence analysis to examine how elementary school EFL teachers perceive the effectiveness of various professional development activities (PDA) in relation to key dimensions of teacher professional development (TPD). Data were collected from 139 in-service English teachers in Taiwanese elementary schools through a structured questionnaire. The analysis revealed that EFL teachers’ perceptions varied notably based on their years of teaching experience and academic qualifications. While professional growth, subject-specific development, and curriculum and teaching consistently emerged as core PD dimensions across groups, novice teachers and those with bachelor’s degrees tended to favor a wider array of collaborative and reflective activities, such as teaching journals, teacher communities, and portfolios. In contrast, more experienced and master’s-level teachers demonstrated a preference for integrated, content-focused approaches, particularly workshops and observation linked to classroom management. Across all subgroups, seminars and collaborative teaching showed weaker associations with perceived effectiveness, particularly when linked to abstract or less actionable PD dimensions. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring TPD programs to align with EFL teachers’ developmental stages and academic backgrounds. Differentiated, targeted TPD design may enhance both relevance and impact in supporting EFL teacher growth and instructional quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping-Huang Sheu, 2025. "Analyzing the Relative Effectiveness of Professional Development Activities and Dimensions for Elementary School Teachers of English as a Foreign Language," International Journal of Educational Studies, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 8(4), pages 62-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:62-74:id:437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/article/view/437/228
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:62-74:id:437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucía Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.