IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajo/ijoest/v8y2025i4p23-36id429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Learning Outcomes Based on Teaching Modality and Gender: Do Online Students have Equivalent Academic Performance as Campus-Based Learners?

Author

Listed:
  • Bahaudin G. Mujtaba

Abstract

Accreditation bodies require that learning goals and outcomes of higher education courses and programs remain the same for traditional campus-based face-to-face, online, and hybrid teaching modalities. This study aims to assess and compare learning gained in an undergraduate course entitled "Managing Workforce Diversity" and to measure performance among students completing the course online compared to those attending in a traditional campus-based format. The study used a quantitative analysis of final exam scores from 414 students. Student performance was defined as the score on the final exam and the overall accumulated total course grade. Both online and traditional face-to-face students received the same learning outcomes, assignments, lectures, and exams. The results showed a statistically significant difference in the accumulated total course scores of students, with online students performing better. Female students had a significantly higher overall total course score compared to their male counterparts. Overall, both male and female groups had higher performance online. Implications for disparate impact based on gender and recommendations are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, 2025. "Assessment of Learning Outcomes Based on Teaching Modality and Gender: Do Online Students have Equivalent Academic Performance as Campus-Based Learners?," International Journal of Educational Studies, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 8(4), pages 23-36.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:23-36:id:429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/article/view/429/224
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:23-36:id:429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LucĂ­a Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.