IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aip/access/v8y2027i1p56-70.html

Stock market reaction to Hindenburg research report and judicial intervention in Adani Group

Author

Listed:
  • Tanupriya SINGH

    (Think Gas Ltd, Chennai, India)

  • Shivam AZAD

    (Jaipuria Institute of Management Lucknow, Lucknow, India)

  • Nilesh Kumar TIWARI

    (Jaipuria Institute of Management Lucknow, Lucknow, India)

  • Mridula RAJAK

    (Rites Ltd, Gurugram, India)

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the stock market reaction of nine listed Adani Group companies to two sequential information events, the publication of the Hindenburg Research report and the subsequent Supreme Court judgment, to examine how investors revised their expectations following adverse corporate allegations and judicial developments. Methods/Approach: The study employs the event study methodology using a 21-day event window to analyse abnormal stock returns surrounding the publication of the Hindenburg Research report on 24 January 2023 and the Supreme Court judgment on 3 January 2024. Three market models were used to estimate abnormal returns and evaluate the statistical significance of the market reaction. Results: The findings indicate that the Hindenburg Research report generated negative stock price movements across all nine listed Adani Group companies. However, statistically significant abnormal returns were observed only for Adani Green Energy Ltd., Adani Enterprises Ltd., Adani Wilmar Ltd., Adani Power Ltd., and Adani Total Gas Ltd. Among the companies, Adani Total Gas Ltd. experienced the largest cumulative decline, with its share price falling by approximately 83% by 28 February 2023. Following the Supreme Court judgment, a statistically significant positive abnormal return was observed only for Adani Power Ltd. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that activist short-seller reports can substantially influence investor behaviour and stock prices, while subsequent judicial developments may only partially mitigate the adverse market reaction. The study provides practical implications for investors, corporate managers, regulators, and policymakers regarding information credibility, corporate governance, and market efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanupriya SINGH & Shivam AZAD & Nilesh Kumar TIWARI & Mridula RAJAK, 2027. "Stock market reaction to Hindenburg research report and judicial intervention in Adani Group," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 8(1), pages 56-70, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:8:y:2027:i:1:p:56-70
    DOI: 10.46656/access.2027.8.1(3)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.access-bg.org/journalfiles/journal/issue-8-1-2027/stock_market_reaction_to_hindenburg_research_report.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46656/access.2027.8.1(3)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:8:y:2027:i:1:p:56-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mariana Petrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://access-bg.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.