IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aip/access/v8y2027i1p159-178.html

A cross-sector analysis of employees’ perceptions of workplace conflicts in Bulgarian organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Ivanka MIHAYLOVA

    (Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski", Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Bozhidar NEDEV

    (Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski", Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Background: Workplace conflicts may have both constructive and destructive consequences for employees and organizations, making their management important for employee well-being and organizational effectiveness. Although workplace conflicts have been examined in specific sectors in Bulgaria, evidence remains limited regarding whether employees’ perceptions and the relationships among different aspects of workplace conflict vary across economic sectors. Objectives: The study aims to examine employees’ perceptions of conflict incidence, conflict resolution, satisfaction with conflict resolution, and self-efficacy across major economic sectors in Bulgaria and to determine whether the levels and relationships among these variables are similar across sectors. Methods/Approach: The study is based on an online survey of 1,016 full-time employees from organizations operating across six economic sectors in Bulgaria: manufacturing, commerce, services, finance, the public sector, and the non-profit sector. Descriptive statistics, sector-specific Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Kruskal–Wallis tests, Spearman’s rank correlations, and pairwise permutation tests of sector-specific correlations were applied. Holm adjustment was used to account for multiple comparisons. Results: A similar tendency was observed across the six sectors. Conflict incidence was significantly below the scale midpoint, whereas conflict resolution, satisfaction, and self-efficacy were significantly above it in every sector. Kruskal–Wallis tests revealed no statistically significant sectoral differences in any of the four variables, with very small effect sizes. Conflict incidence was negatively associated with the other variables across most sectors, while strong positive correlations among conflict resolution, satisfaction, and self-efficacy were observed across all sectors. Pairwise permutation tests showed that the strength of these relationships was largely stable across sectors. After Holm adjustment, only the association between conflict incidence and self-efficacy differed significantly between the public sector and commerce. Conclusions: Employees’ perceptions of workplace conflicts are broadly similar across economic sectors in Bulgaria, both in their overall levels and in the relationships among the examined variables. Cross-sector similarities are considerably more prominent than differences, suggesting that the identified patterns of workplace conflict and its resolution extend across diverse organizational contexts. The findings may support the development of conflict management practices applicable across different sectors while also highlighting the need to consider specific organizational contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivanka MIHAYLOVA & Bozhidar NEDEV, 2027. "A cross-sector analysis of employees’ perceptions of workplace conflicts in Bulgarian organizations," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 8(1), pages 159-178, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:8:y:2027:i:1:p:159-178
    DOI: 10.46656/access.2027.8.1(9)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.access-bg.org/journalfiles/journal/issue-8-1-2027/a_cross-sector_analysis_of_employees_perceptions_of_workplace_conflicts_in-bg_organizations.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46656/access.2027.8.1(9)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:8:y:2027:i:1:p:159-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mariana Petrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://access-bg.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.