IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis Concerning The Field Distribution Of The Companies With Liabilities To The State Budget In 2010


  • Daniela Ciotinã

    (University “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iaºi Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Iaºi, Romania)

  • Cristina-Ionela Fãdur

    (University “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iaºi Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Iaºi, Romania)


The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis regarding the field distribution of Romanian companies that have liabilities to the state budget at the end of 2010. In our approach, we have studied all the companies with debts to the state of the category of large companies in Romania. The database comprises 558 large companies, involved in the following activity fields: agriculture, processing industry, electricity and heat production and supply, gas, hot water and air conditioning, water distribution, sanitation, waste management, decontamination activities, civil engineering, commerce, transport and storage, brokerage, and insurance. We can notice an increase in the residual amounts owed to the state budget in comparison to the year 2009, as well as an increase in the number of indebted companies. The largest amount of liabilities comes from the value-added tax, interests and penalties, each having a different share depending on the activity field.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Ciotinã & Cristina-Ionela Fãdur, 2011. "Comparative Analysis Concerning The Field Distribution Of The Companies With Liabilities To The State Budget In 2010," Revista Tinerilor Economisti (The Young Economists Journal), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(16), pages 35-42, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:aio:rteyej:v:1:y:2011:i:16:p:35-42

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Engle, Robert & Granger, Clive, 2015. "Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing," Applied Econometrics, Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 39(3), pages 106-135.
    2. King, Mervyn A & Wadhwani, Sushil, 1990. "Transmission of Volatility between Stock Markets," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 3(1), pages 5-33.
    3. Jagannathan, Ravi & Wang, Zhenyu, 1996. " The Conditional CAPM and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 51(1), pages 3-53, March.
    4. Kasa, Kenneth, 1992. "Common stochastic trends in international stock markets," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 95-124, February.
    5. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1989. "Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 23-49, November.
    6. Ferson, Wayne E & Harvey, Campbell R, 1991. "The Variation of Economic Risk Premiums," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(2), pages 385-415, April.
    7. Granger, Clive W J, 1986. "Developments in the Study of Cointegrated Economic Variables," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 48(3), pages 213-228, August.
    8. Granger, C. W. J., 1988. "Some recent development in a concept of causality," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1-2), pages 199-211.
    9. Johansen, Soren, 1995. "Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198774501, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    budgetary overdue debts; liabilities; large companies; descriptive analysis; state budget;

    JEL classification:

    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • M38 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Government Policy and Regulation


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:rteyej:v:1:y:2011:i:16:p:35-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ionascu Costel). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.