IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aib/ibtjbs/v11y2015i2p108-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work Life Balance Initiatives And Service Encounters Employees Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Badar Zaman

    (Phd Scholar at Iqra University, Karachi)

  • Naveed Anwar

    (Assistant Professor at ZABIST Larkana Campus)

  • Raj Kumar Lohano

    (Phd Scholar at Iqra University, Karachi)

Abstract

PurposeHospitals are very vital as an element in Quality Care delivery and their evaluation in these terms on perpetual basis are much needed as these organizations contribute in improving health outcomes for general people.Hospitals, especially privately owned, are also run like businesses these days to remain competitive in the respective arena.The environment and situation faced by many hospitals are often complicated and which definitely requires insightful solutions to steer the direction of these businesses.This study was focused on the application of group decisionmaking tool, DEMATEL as one of the valid methods in MultiCriteria Decision Making MCDM.Methodology The study was exploratory in nature and efforts were made to justify by highlighting the criteria prioritization procedure to be undertaken by any healthcare organization.A slight deviation from standard foursteps of DEMATEL, a course of action was created in shape of eightstep procedure to exhibit a practical approach rather than mathematical theory approach.In order to make it more empirical in nature, a fivestage research framework was also devised and acted upon with the help of three separate questionnaires.Avedis Donabedian’s 1988 Quality Care framework was followed and multiple variables were devised, importance ratings were collected from patients on these devised variables and after reduction of variables in to manageable latent factors, called criteria in the study, DEMATEL method was applied to depict the prioritization of Quality Care criteria for the delivery of quality service via digraph.FindingsThe graphical representation through digraph showed that criteria were vertically divided in two halves as C1, C5, and C4 are shown as criteria influencing the lower half criteria C3, C6, and C2.The horizontal span of digraph reflected the importance of criteria prioritized and showed C1 criterion as the most important and C2 criterion with least importance.ImplicationsThe prioritization of the criteria along with their cause and effect distribution gave an insight into the constitution framework of localized healthcare services of Karachi, Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Badar Zaman & Naveed Anwar & Raj Kumar Lohano, 2015. "Work Life Balance Initiatives And Service Encounters Employees Perspective," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 11(2), pages 108-122.
  • Handle: RePEc:aib:ibtjbs:v:11:y:2015:i:2:p:108-122
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.46745/ilma.ibtjbs.2015.112.9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ibtjbs.ilmauniversity.edu.pk/journal/jbs/11.2/9.%20Work-Life%20Balance%20Initiatives%20&%20Service%20Encounters%20Employees%20Perspective.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.46745/ilma.ibtjbs.2015.112.9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sathya Rashmi GURUGE & Joowon BAN, 2021. "Analysing the Impact of Occupational Stress on Employee Performance: A Case Study on Hayleys Plantations and Tea Export PLC in Sri Lanka," RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 5(2), pages 26-37, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    page error;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aib:ibtjbs:v:11:y:2015:i:2:p:108-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Syed Kashif Rafi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmilmpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.